Can An MRI Scan Detect Hematomas?
MRI is usually accurate
Detailed Answer:
Hi.
Thanks for your query.
Read the history about your daughter and understood your concerns.
Please give additional information for me to assist you better:
Was there any injury that caused hematoma?
Are there any symptoms related to the lump?
What is the size now? Is it XXXXXXX or fixed?
Is the skin above normal?
What is the age of patient?
When was MRI done?
Please post the report of MRI and clear, focused photos if possible.
MRI diagnosis of hematoma can be accurate.
Also needed is proper history, clinical evaluation, aspiration if done to confirm the diagnosis.
It does not take so long in resolution of a hematoma.
Persistence of a lump after 6-7 months indicate a sequel of organization of hematoma with fibrosis or calcification if hematoma was well diagnosed.
Also the surgeon said he would watch it because it has shrunk, but will remove it if we want it to be removed. Is there any chance it could still go away?
Review - HRUSG - FNAC
Detailed Answer:
Hi.
Thanks for your feedback.
Anything that is present for 6 months and reducing in size can not be cancerous. And MRI would have shows something.
I would advise you to get a review by your Surgeon, request for High Resolution Ultrasound (HRUSG) and FNAC (fine needle aspiration cytology) to get a confirmed diagnosis and a plan of further management if need be.
Very difficult to say that it would go away.
I hope this answers your query.
Please feel free to ask for further relevant queries if you feel that there is a gap of communication.
Yes, wait and watch policy.
Detailed Answer:
Certainly yes.
When was the last ultrasound done?
If it is shrinking, no symptoms, ultrasound did not show a blood flow to the lump, no worry then.
In my opinion you can follow the policy of wait and watch.
That is just a guess though, they didn't really tell us why they wanted an ultrasound after the mri. As far as I know, an MRI gives a better pic then an ultrasound? All I know is that it showed no blood flow to the lump, that's all they told us.
USG and MRI has its own advantages.
Detailed Answer:
Feb is a long ago.
It is better to have a review; helps to know the exact condition at the moment and helps to alleviate the anxiety.
Ultrasonography is done in real time and has color doppler attachment that can show the blood flow, also help for guided FNAC if needed. Also has good picture quality, albeit MRI has its own advantages for the better picture quality.
This is called sequel
Detailed Answer:
Change of hematoma to something else is called a sequel as I have mentioned above and is a normal natural process in some patients.
I advised to have an Opinion of the Surgeon, an ultrasound with color doppler and FNAC if required to know the exact position and thus know the prognosis since the last Ultrasound and MRI were done a long ago and the lump still remains although has reduced in size.
This will also help to reduce the stress/anxiety.
There are tow options to choose from.
Detailed Answer:
If your Surgeon has so well assured you, why is so much anxiety?
We have two options: one is to wait and watch and another as mentioned above.
If you are still not assured go for second option and alleviate the stress.
There is nothing to be confused.
If the confusion prevails then too go for second option to get the recent status.
Thanks for your appreciation
Detailed Answer:
You are most welcome.