
Do Frequent Radiation Treatments Increase The Risk Of Getting Cancer?

Unlikely to cause cancer
Detailed Answer:
Hi
Thanks for your query.
I do understand your worries. But there is no real reason to panic here. While it is true that unnecessary scans and attendant radiation should be avoided, but there is no restriction on medical scanning as long as they are medically indicated. In your case the CT angio was normal but it gave confidence to the doctor not to start anti-coagulants, which also have their own side effects.
In addition, one CT angio is very unlikely to cause cancer. Lung cancer can occur in never smokers also, the prime suspect there is environmental pollution, not medical diagnostic radiation procedures. I would certainly not recommend any further screening apart from routine screening programs in place, eg screening mammograms.
I would suggest you to put that episode behind you and look forward to a healthy life.
Hope this helps.
Regards


Kind regards
Those studies have lots of shortcomings
Detailed Answer:
in my practice I hardly see any cancer patients with history of CT angiography in the past. Some do have history of CT scans but that is quite common nowadays.
there is no recommendations to watch lung after CT scans.
Basically I think you should not lose your sleep over this CT angiography.


With the science of today, are there biological markers that can be detected in a bloodsample or other type of sample, that can catch lungcancer early?
This is my last and third post. I thank you for your time and replies.
Kind regards
I think the comparison is bit exaggerated
Detailed Answer:
Chext Xray dose is around 0.1 mSv while CT angio 10mSv, so it is around 100 times and does sound awful. Still the lifetime risk increased by one CT angio is not so huge as to confer a death nail. You still have a much higher odds of doing fine rather than having cancer.
Unfortunately no biomarker helps in this scenario. No particular part of lungs will be more predisposed as the radiation in CT angio pretty much affects the entire lungs.


I had this ct angiogram in my early 20's.
I have been exposed to passive smoking from restaurants, friends.
I was an occasional social smoker from 24 to 34 because I don't drink alcohol. ( It was quite shallow inhalation)
I did a few joints now and then one year.
I have a cousin with lung cancer , aged only 42.
Thank you again for your time.
Low risk for lung cancer
Detailed Answer:
As per standard guidelines (like XXXXXXX Thoracic society), you will be in low-risk group for lung cancer and no screening is recommended.

Answered by

Get personalised answers from verified doctor in minutes across 80+ specialties
