HealthCareMagic is now Ask A Doctor - 24x7 | https://www.askadoctor24x7.com

question-icon

Does Intake Of Antiarythmics Help In Curing Atrial Fibrillation?

default
Posted on Wed, 23 Mar 2016
Question: I have been converted out of Afib 3 times in six years. I recently was placed on sotalol and spent 2.5 days in the hospital for monitoring. Having side effects and the cardiologist has told me to stop taking it and we will start a new med. Should I keep trying antiarythmics or go for a cardioblation proceedure?


My follow up is: How long does it take for Sotalol to flush out of my system so I stop having the side effect of tightness in my chest and hard to breath?

So you know they did an EKG today and it showed a normal rhythm.
doctor
Answered by Dr. Priyank Mody (1 hour later)
Brief Answer:
A trail of medication is still better option for atrial fibrillation

Detailed Answer:
Hello , I am Dr. Mody and I would be addressing your concern.

It's always a treatment dilemma how to treat atrial fibrillation as the the treatment have its drawback .
I would hereby enumerate my observations.

1) The half life of sotalol is 10 -20 hours . So XXXXXXX by a day sotalol is cleared from your circulation and the symptoms should completely subside .
2) Sotalol is one of finer drugs and with minimum side effects . Maybe if you say that sinus rhythm has already been achieved decrease the dose .

Alternatively metoprolol or any other cardioselective beta blocker which may have a minimum side effects but at the same time less effective may be tried .

3) ablation is also not foul proof way and it's success in complete termination of atrial fibrillation without recurrence is less than 60 % . So if that acceptable , you may go ahead with ablation .

4) Do send me the list of medication already tried , and your echocardiography for atrail dimensions, so that I can suggest the medication and how effective ablation would be .

I would still consider a trail of medication with the aim of just rate control rather than rhythm control so as to balance side effects vs . Control of Atrial fibrillation.

Let me know if any clarification needed and I would be happy to help .
Regards Dr Priyank Mody
Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Arnab Banerjee
doctor
default
Follow up: Dr. Priyank Mody (17 hours later)
Dr.
I have been on Multaq, Metropolol, and Sotalol. The sotalol caused an issue with breathing and I had to stop using it.
While in AFIB this is the last report on heart function.



TYPE OF REPORT: Regadenoson myocardial SPECT stress examination DATE

OF SERVICE: 02/28/2013

HISTORY: This is a 56-year-old gentleman with no known coronary

disease. He has hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, and a family

history of coronary disease. He has a history of tobacco use. He

has been experiencing recent dyspnea.

TECHNIQUE: Rest images obtained after the administration of 10.91

mCi of technetium 99 sestamibi. Post stress examination obtained

after the administration of 30.6 mCi of technetium 99 sestamibi.

Baseline electrocardiogram demonstrates sinus bradycardia with a

heart rate of 53 beats per minute and no ischemic ST or T wave

changes. The patient was given intravenous regadenoson. Heart rate

increased from 53 beats per minute to 85 beats per minute. Blood

pressure increased from 132/84 to 148/84. There were no ischemic ST

or T wave changes.

IMAGES: Careful review of attenuation and non-attenuation corrected

images demonstrates inferior wall attenuation on both rest and stress

images. There are no other reversible or irreversible perfusion

defects noted. Gated wall motion analysis demonstrates overall

preserved left ventricular systolic function with ejection fraction

of 69% and normal inferior wall motion. The inferior wall

attenuation is thus secondary to artifact.

IMPRESSION:

1. Myocardial SPECT images negative for ischemia or infarction.

2. Preserved left ventricular systolic function with calculated

ejection fraction of 69%.

END OF REPORT:

Seems my heart is healthy enough but I would like to not worry about a recurrence of afib.

Thank you!
doctor
Answered by Dr. Priyank Mody (29 hours later)
Brief Answer:
Yes the heart seems well , Some precaution to prevent recurrence as below

Detailed Answer:
Hello,
Yes the SPECT scan of your heart was completely normal in 2013 .

However I would like to point out that hypertension is the most common cause of atrial fibrillation throughout the world, because it cause relaxation abnormality of the upper chamber .

Off all the medication list you have mentioned. Metoprolol is the best and safest medication, so if you tolerate is well , it will take care of your atrial fibrillation and help in reducing blood pressure as well .

Another group which may be tried is calcium channel blocker like Verapamil or diltiazem as an alternative to beta blocker .

If the reason for atrial fibrillation was reversible , it wouldn't occur again , but in your case where the cause is not known and may be plain aging there is a fair chance that there may be paroxysmal event which you may jot even notice (subclinical ) so I would suggest continuation of any of above discussed medication preferably from net a blocker or calcium channel blocker group .

Also if any recurrence , anticoagulation or aspirin should be considered based on your scoring ( discuss the same with your doctor ) .

Some care you should take are

Thyroid abnormality should be ruled out , if obese and snore at night ( sleep apnea) as reversible cause should be ruled out .

Hypertension should be strictly controlled .

Also ischaemia or structural heart problems causing AF should be monitored.

Avoid stimulants like smoking , tobacco , drugs , tea coffee, binge alcohol drinking or excess mental or physical stress . Adequate sleep is necessary. All these will prevent surge of adrenaline in the circulation and prevent triggering of AF.

Whenever possible do send your 2 D Echo cardiography and furthur information about how it all started and the exact present secenerio.

Do let me know if any clarification needed and I would be happy to help.
Do rate for other s reference .
Regards Dr Priyank Mody
Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Arnab Banerjee
doctor
default
Follow up: Dr. Priyank Mody (22 minutes later)
Thank you.
doctor
Answered by Dr. Priyank Mody (6 minutes later)
Brief Answer:
wishing you the best of health . Regards

Detailed Answer:
It's my pleasure that I could help you in any way ,
Atrial fibrillation is a vast topic and presents with different challenges, resulting in individualisation of treatment.
It's a general rule, that recurrence after ablation is very common so if it is controlled with medication that the best way out , however if there are in tolerable side effects and incessant atrial fibrillation. Ablation can be given a try as it's a safe procedure with no major risks.
Do keep me in the loop about progress in the future , and i would be happy to help.
Wishing you the best of health.
Dr. Priyank Mody
Note: For further queries related to coronary artery disease and prevention, click here.

Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Arnab Banerjee
doctor
Answered by
Dr.
Dr. Priyank Mody

Cardiologist

Practicing since :2009

Answered : 918 Questions

premium_optimized

The User accepted the expert's answer

Share on

Get personalised answers from verified doctor in minutes across 80+ specialties

159 Doctors Online

By proceeding, I accept the Terms and Conditions

HCM Blog Instant Access to Doctors
HCM Blog Questions Answered
HCM Blog Satisfaction
Does Intake Of Antiarythmics Help In Curing Atrial Fibrillation?

Brief Answer: A trail of medication is still better option for atrial fibrillation Detailed Answer: Hello , I am Dr. Mody and I would be addressing your concern. It's always a treatment dilemma how to treat atrial fibrillation as the the treatment have its drawback . I would hereby enumerate my observations. 1) The half life of sotalol is 10 -20 hours . So XXXXXXX by a day sotalol is cleared from your circulation and the symptoms should completely subside . 2) Sotalol is one of finer drugs and with minimum side effects . Maybe if you say that sinus rhythm has already been achieved decrease the dose . Alternatively metoprolol or any other cardioselective beta blocker which may have a minimum side effects but at the same time less effective may be tried . 3) ablation is also not foul proof way and it's success in complete termination of atrial fibrillation without recurrence is less than 60 % . So if that acceptable , you may go ahead with ablation . 4) Do send me the list of medication already tried , and your echocardiography for atrail dimensions, so that I can suggest the medication and how effective ablation would be . I would still consider a trail of medication with the aim of just rate control rather than rhythm control so as to balance side effects vs . Control of Atrial fibrillation. Let me know if any clarification needed and I would be happy to help . Regards Dr Priyank Mody