HealthCareMagic is now Ask A Doctor - 24x7 | https://www.askadoctor24x7.com

question-icon

Hello, I'm A 67 Yr Old Male Who Quit Smoking

default
Posted on Thu, 13 Dec 2018
Question: Hello,

I'm a 67 yr old male who quit smoking 30 years ago after 34 pack years. Ive been in a LDCT program since 2012 and have a history of 8 nodules 1-4mm and the rest less than 4mm that are either stable(2+ yrs) or no longer present. Yesterday I had a screen that showed the following:
"Major airways patent. There is no focal consolidation, pleural effusion, or pneumothorax. Linear atelectasis is identified in the medial segment of the left lower lobe. biapical pleural scarring is noted. Nrw nodularity in the anterior aspects of the left lower lobe is noted measuring 2 mm. This may represent a small vessel. Oblong 4 mm nodule in the lateral aspect is unchanged. 2 mm nodules in the right lower lobe were not previously seen. A new 4 mm nodule is identified in the lateral aspect of the left upper lobe. Subtle tree-in-bud and groundglass nodularity is identified in the medial aspect ofv the left upper lobe. This is more apparent versus the comparison study.(June 2017, Feb 2018). Additional new nodules in the mid aspect of the left lower lobe and tree-in-bud nodularity is noted. these nodules measure 2-3 mm. New 3 mm nodule identified in the left lower lobe.
Impression: New bilateral pulmonary nodules measuring up to 4 mm. Scattered areas od tree-in-bud nodularity are also new in interval. The findings may reflect inflammatory changes. Thes nodules are categorized as lung RADS cat 3, probably benign. 6 mo follow-up ldct for surveillance recommended.
I have had 2 squamous cell scalp cancers in past 10 yrs. There is no family history of lung cancer or emphysema. I haven't had a upper respiratory infection this year and am in otherwise good health. The radiologist said my 4 mm was solid and not spiculated. I'm trying to estimate my lung cancer risk. I,ve looked at various lung nodule calculators that indicate my risk is .2% to 10% for the 4 mm nodule. Also read "LUNG CANCER RISK ASSOCIATED WITH NEW SOLID NODULES IN THE NLST(Natl Lung Scr Tr). which indicated an interval 1.1% risk for the 7 smaller nodules and 2.3% risk for the 4 mm. Simply put-(1.1% x 7) plus 2.3%=10% risk. Do you think I'm over or undersestimating my risk? Can you give me an an estimate of my risk? I really don't know if I'm at 2.3% or 10% or ??? Also which of the risk calculators should be used? XXXXXXX Mayo, none of the above???
Thanks for all your help.
doctor
Answered by Dr. Dr. Jolanda (45 minutes later)
Brief Answer:
please read the following

Detailed Answer:
Hello and welcome to 'Ask A Doctor' service.

I read carefully the information you have provided.

I'd recommend you to see also the last recommendations or guidelines of Fleischner society 2018 (its free online) that has appeared recently related to lung nodules and their follow up. It provides information for the lung cancer risk too but not using a formulation but using the high-risk groups of patients.

I strongly recommend it. However, I can say that their appearance as you explain is benign and only follow up with chest CT can be done in such circumstances.

In my opinion, you are overestimating the risk. Usually, we doctors don't do the risk-based on formulas alone.

Hope to have been helpful.
Feel free to ask me again.

Regards


Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Arnab Banerjee
doctor
default
Follow up: Dr. Dr. Jolanda (2 hours later)
Thanks for your response. What is it about my report that makes you think my nodule(s) are benign? And should I be concerned about the implications of actelasis and new nodules in my lower left lobe? Any specifics are appreciated. I'm comfortable with most medical jargon. Thanks again!
default
Follow up: Dr. Dr. Jolanda (1 minute later)
And if I'm overestimating risk, what is my risk approximately?
doctor
Answered by Dr. Dr. Jolanda (10 minutes later)
Brief Answer:
continue discussion

Detailed Answer:
Hi again

Usually benign nodules are small and with no spicular borders and do not change their size during the time.Regarding the atelectasis as you explain it might be post inflammatory and its not serious.
For the new nodule i recommend the close follow up in a period of 6-12 months with chest ct.
About the risk according to your previous smoking history you are a low-intermediate risk patient for developing lung cancer.However we should emphasize that a strong factor is the genetic predisposition of yours.

Regards

Dr.Jolanda
Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Raju A.T
doctor
default
Follow up: Dr. Dr. Jolanda (1 hour later)
Thanks very much!
doctor
Answered by Dr. Dr. Jolanda (8 hours later)
Brief Answer:
continue discussion

Detailed Answer:
You are welcome anytime

Best regards

Dr.Jolanda
Above answer was peer-reviewed by : Dr. Nagamani Ng
doctor
Answered by
Dr.
Dr. Dr. Jolanda

Pulmonologist

Practicing since :2003

Answered : 2902 Questions

premium_optimized

The User accepted the expert's answer

Share on

Get personalised answers from verified doctor in minutes across 80+ specialties

159 Doctors Online

By proceeding, I accept the Terms and Conditions

HCM Blog Instant Access to Doctors
HCM Blog Questions Answered
HCM Blog Satisfaction
Hello, I'm A 67 Yr Old Male Who Quit Smoking

Brief Answer: please read the following Detailed Answer: Hello and welcome to 'Ask A Doctor' service. I read carefully the information you have provided. I'd recommend you to see also the last recommendations or guidelines of Fleischner society 2018 (its free online) that has appeared recently related to lung nodules and their follow up. It provides information for the lung cancer risk too but not using a formulation but using the high-risk groups of patients. I strongly recommend it. However, I can say that their appearance as you explain is benign and only follow up with chest CT can be done in such circumstances. In my opinion, you are overestimating the risk. Usually, we doctors don't do the risk-based on formulas alone. Hope to have been helpful. Feel free to ask me again. Regards