Suggest Treatment For Trigeminal Neuralgia
Read below.
Detailed Answer:
I read your question carefully and I understand your concern.
I am a little puzzled by the neurosurgeon saying that the procedure needing one year to work. That is too long a time, for the overwhelming part improvement is seen immediately after surgery. There may be the rare exceptions but still after 3 months too much time has passed I wouldn't expect much improvement. Of course it may happen. While it has a high success rate of 80-90%, there is that small number of patients who undergo MVD with no success. Given that there were issues during surgery the chances of non success would be higher in this case.
As for it being related to the sinuses I do not think that is the case. Apart from a sinus issue being visible on MRI, the characteristics of pain are completely different and easy to distinguish even without MRI.
Changes in barometric pressure are common in trigeminal neuralgia, causes not completely understood, but is thought due to pressure changes on trigeminal afferents as well as dilation of blood vessels.
Regarding what procedures to try, perhaps you may have already read about them before choosing MVD, they include percutaneous procedures which are done by inserting a needle and damaging the nerve through different techniques or gamma knife surgery which uses rays to damage the nerve. As for which centers are more advanced in research and treatment of trigeminal neuralgia some suggestions would be XXXXXXX XXXXXXX in XXXXXXX or the Mayo Clinic in XXXXXXX Minnesota.
I remain at your disposal for other questions.
Her surgeon is all surgeon (not very consoling) and was sure this would work. Some of the pain is lessened but she is still in considerable pain. This is nuts! She can't even eat.
Read below.
Detailed Answer:
Well XXXXXXX XXXXXXX is among the leading clinics in the US and the world, so hard to go higher than that really, as I said though there is a 10-20% of patients for which procedure doesn't help even in the hands of the best. I am not sure what you mean by the surgeon being all surgeon, does that mean a general surgeon? Trigeminal neuralgia decompression procedures are done by neurosurgeons, from what I can see on the XXXXXXX XXXXXXX website their Trigeminal Neuralgia Center team is composed only of neurosurgeons as well.
Glycerol injection procedure is one of the several percutaneous procedures, one of the most popular ones. Of course if the MVD surgery was successful it wouldn't be necessary. However since MVD seems not to work and neither do the medications (you mention her to have tried many of them) then I do not really see other alternatives, alongside with gamma knife surgery it seems to be the remaining options.
Let me know if I can further assist you.
Would you say there is less risk with the glycerol injection than the gamma knife...that is the impression I get from all that I have read. this is my last question...and thank you for your help, Dr.!
Yes it's the procedure with less risk involved.
Detailed Answer:
Thank you for clearing the all surgeon thing up. I am still not in agreement with that one year period, some improvement should have happened, at least a partial one (allowing for better control through medication at least).
In answer to your question, yes glycerol injection is less invasive and involves less risk for the patient than other procedures.
Read below.
Detailed Answer:
Sorry for answering a little late but due to time differences your question had come just as I had gone to sleep and I could answer only now.
I get questions about acupuncture all the time, whether for trigeminal neuralgia or for other types of pain. I have also had individual patients telling success stories with acupuncture. Trouble is that because usually those who exercise it are not part of the medical community there aren't many studies to compare its efficacy with other methods of treatment or placebo. Any treatment in medicine is recommended based on studies involving large number of patients in order to avoid coincidences. So it is hard to recommend it based on solid evidence. I can say that it is safe, so won't do any harm to try if other options are not working, but I can't provide guarantees or success chances.
The lack of evidence applies to craniosacral therapy as well, and perhaps as it's not diffused here I am afraid I haven't had any patient reporting success with it.
A control MRI does make sense to check about the technical success of the procedure and whether there is any visible indentation of a blood vessel on the nerve persisting even after the MVD.
I hope to have been of help.
I not asking another question (!!) but just clarification...did you mean an MRA or an MRI?
my understanding is that an MRA would be telling about the vascular situation...so I'm thinking that's what you meant...also that's what I had asked...
I understand there's a big time difference so no worries on that.
MRA
Detailed Answer:
Hello again!
Sorry if I created some confusion, I meant precisely what you had in mind, a MRA, a MRI including angio sequences which visualize blood vessels.