How Long Does CRT Take To Show Its Effect?
Question: crt d implantation in what extent of EF improvement the patient can receive ?? since the patient rate of 15%
The patient heart rate is still the same 15% can CRT D improve the situation or there other treatment to follow such chelation therapy
The patient heart rate is still the same 15% can CRT D improve the situation or there other treatment to follow such chelation therapy
Brief Answer:
Should wait to see results
Detailed Answer:
Dear Mrs,
You should wait 3-6 months to have the full effects of CRT. Usually in majority of patients there is significantly increase after CRT implantation. But there are small amount of patients who don't have any benefit or have small benefits.
It is individual, and the only way to know how the patient will benefit, is to wait.
Other options are left ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation
There are inotropic medications also, which can increase rejection fraction a little, but they don't have wide usage.
Hope I could help you
Wishing you good health
Regards,
Should wait to see results
Detailed Answer:
Dear Mrs,
You should wait 3-6 months to have the full effects of CRT. Usually in majority of patients there is significantly increase after CRT implantation. But there are small amount of patients who don't have any benefit or have small benefits.
It is individual, and the only way to know how the patient will benefit, is to wait.
Other options are left ventricular assist devices and heart transplantation
There are inotropic medications also, which can increase rejection fraction a little, but they don't have wide usage.
Hope I could help you
Wishing you good health
Regards,
Above answer was peer-reviewed by :
Dr. Bhagyalaxmi Nalaparaju
what about chelation therapy as other option for heart failure
Brief Answer:
Chelation therapy is not good option
Detailed Answer:
Welcome back,
Chelation therapy is not a good option as it can harm even more especially in patients with low ejection fraction.
Regards,
Chelation therapy is not good option
Detailed Answer:
Welcome back,
Chelation therapy is not a good option as it can harm even more especially in patients with low ejection fraction.
Regards,
Above answer was peer-reviewed by :
Dr. Ashwin Bhandari
Thank you so much for previous answers. It's my mother is diagnosed with dilated cardiomyopathy since 2005. EF 15% LVID 65/55 moderate MR global hypokinesia. No orthopnoes or PND BP 112 (report since three months) medication :-
Spironolactone 25g/1Table
Fruesmide 40mg/1Table
Carvidelol 6.25mg/1Table
Valsartan 80mg/1Table
She had miner stroke three weeks ago because of heart and blood hymoglopine 17
Do you recommend to go with heart transplant for her case.
Spironolactone 25g/1Table
Fruesmide 40mg/1Table
Carvidelol 6.25mg/1Table
Valsartan 80mg/1Table
She had miner stroke three weeks ago because of heart and blood hymoglopine 17
Do you recommend to go with heart transplant for her case.
Brief Answer:
No need for heart transplantation
Detailed Answer:
Dear Mrs,
As I concluded from given information your mother doesn't have severe heart failure despite low ejection fraction. She is doing quite well with small doses of medications.
In this case there is no need to go for heart transplant. She should continue her medications.
Wishing good health to your mother
Regards,
No need for heart transplantation
Detailed Answer:
Dear Mrs,
As I concluded from given information your mother doesn't have severe heart failure despite low ejection fraction. She is doing quite well with small doses of medications.
In this case there is no need to go for heart transplant. She should continue her medications.
Wishing good health to your mother
Regards,
Note: For further queries related to coronary artery disease and prevention, click here.
Above answer was peer-reviewed by :
Dr. Vinay Bhardwaj