 
                            Suggest Treatment For Cancerous Rectal Polyp After First Colonoscopy
 
 
                                    
                                     Fri, 30 May 2014
                                                
                                            
                                                Answered on
                                                
                                                Fri, 30 May 2014
                                                
                                            
                                                Answered on
                                             
                                             Thu, 19 Jun 2014
                                                
                                                
                                                Last reviewed on
                                                
                                                Thu, 19 Jun 2014
                                                
                                                
                                                Last reviewed on
                                             
                                            Cannot say
Detailed Answer:
Earlier detection would have been helpful.
Your detail states that the polyp was 1.6x1.3cm and 0.3cm deep. This was detected 7 months after the first colonoscopy. Obviously, this would have been much smaller (less than half or more of the present size) at first colonoscopy and hence could have been missed.
If you are looking for an answer as to whether the outcome would have been different, it would be very difficult to answer. The answer would be yes and no. There is NO way of finding out the exact stage of disease at that point of time locally and systemically. If there was NO spread at that point of time, the outcome would be different. If there was spread at that time itself, the outcome would NOT be different. THE UNDERLYING FACT IS THAT THERE IS NO WAY TO FIND THAT OUT. Since the proof either way is NOT feasible, the question would be redunant.
It is NOT the size but depth of invasion of the tumor that determines the ability to spread. Of course, other tumor factors also play a role. Hence, "less that 2cm size has only 10% chance of spread" is not a very correct idea.
You should also be aware of an entity called "interval cancer". These are cancers which are NOT detected at screening but manifest in between two screening procedures. This could well be one of them. These are known to be very aggressive and would generally have a poorer outcome. From your description this could well be a case of interval cancer.
 
 Answered by
 
                                                    Get personalised answers from verified doctor in minutes across 80+ specialties
 
                         Sign in with Google
 Sign in with Google 
  
                                 
                                