What Do These ECG And Nuclear Stress Test Reports Indicate?
Procedure info: This test was a technically difficult study. Views were limited by poor acoustic availability.
Left Ventricle: systolic function at lower limits of normal by visual assessment. EF estimated in the 50% to 55% range. Wall thickness was normal. There was fusion of early and atrial contributions to ventricular filling. Indeterminate diastolic function.
Right ventricle: mild dilating. Systolic function was low normal. Est peak pressure was 40 to 45%.
Right atrium: mildly dilated.
Left atrium: size upper limits of normal. Vol index was 33.
Mitral valve: normal structure with mild regurgitation.
Aortic valve: tripartite with mild increased thickness. No significant regurgitation.
Tricuspid valve: normal structure. Mild regurgitation. Right atrial pressure est: 5-10 moNth.
Pullbox valve: not well visualized.
Systemic veins: IVC: the inferior vena cava was normal in size. Respirophasic changes were blunted ( less than 50% variation) .
As I read this, it appears as possible early heart failure and given the poor visual acoustics, is it reasonable too ask for a TEE? Could this be related to possible pulmonary hypertension?
Following advice
Detailed Answer:
Hi and thank you for asking!
I read your query and understood your concerns.
First of all the echocardiography findings are compatible with pulmonary embolism and pulmonary hypertension.
Secondly there's no imediate need for TEE since the EF is within the norm (there's no evidence for HF).
However due to poor transtoracic ultrasound window I will like to recommend doing a TEE for a proper evaluation and definitely exclude any minor problem.
What is mor eimportant TEE will reassure you that everythingis ok. Please keep in mind that stress and doubts are the worse enemy.
Hope this will be of help!
Wish you health!
Dr. Shehu
p.s: Ifyou have more questions, pleasedon't hesitate to ask me again.
Today, I was in the therapy pool doing my back PT and ... something happened. I felt SOB before hand and the lifeguard said she saw my head loll backward. Bottom line, they fished me out, sent me by ambulance to the hospital. They repeated CT with contrast - no evidence of new PE. The ER doc said they don't worry about NT-non BNPs until they were in the thousands. Of note, I'm s/p 2 cardiac Ablations. The first was done '95 due to AV node reentry. The second was done in '06 for multifocal atrial tach. My interventional cardiologist "set" my HR between 68-70. Only strenuous exercise changes that to around 100 bpm. I mention this because my HR hung around 50 the whole afternoon in the ER with mostly average BPs. Pulse Ox ranged from 91-98. Remain SOB at home now.
I had my first PEs in 2010 and bounced right back. I'm a clinical pharmacist and monitor INRs weekly at home. Told I had protein S disorder which I had been told years ago during my residency. My latest PE was July 9th. My SOB has been worsening. I wake up with it and have to sleep on multiple pilllows.
My aunt is an internist in MA and my friend is NP who has done stress tests for a large part of her career. They both are telling me to get a 2nd opinion at the local University Medical Center.
I am physically and emotionally exhausted. Is there any utility in seeing what another cardiologist thinks? I am very aware of stepping on professional toes but I am desperate to get back to work and know if I have aNY other limitations.
Following advice
Detailed Answer:
Hi back,
I think that you should contact another cardiologist for a second opinion. Based on the data you provided my opinion is that you are developing secondary pulmonary hypertension (or chronic cor pulmonale) due to recurrent pulmonary embolism.
The cor pulmonale is manifested with slightly elevated pro BNP, righ side heart enlargement and SOB.
In order to properly evaluate your heart and to confirm such a diagnosis (cor pulmonale) I would recommend to do TEE. Since your doctor refuse to do so a second opinion is needed.
Wish you health!
Dr. Shehu