Question: I went from Seattle to LA to receive a photo-dynamic diagnosis (not available in Seattle). My new highly-credentialed
urologist told me that squamous cells in the urine do NOT come from the bladder, but as contaminants from the vaginal tract upon urine collection from a female. Sheer logic, used by a medically naïve layman, would indicate that this is not true. Think
schistosomiasis. Or, squamous cell intra-epithelial lesions (which I have, low-grade and "possibly concerning high-grade", in my
urine cytology results). I have had a total
hysterectomy and had high-grade intra-ep. lesions on my
cervix. I have
HPV. I am really concerned that this doctor, whom I must rely on in a strange city and who is right now my only contact with this special
cystoscopy, has been big-time illogical. Any ideas as to what would make a good doctor make such a statement? Please understand, this doctor seems a complete expert, works @ Keck Medical Center, but logic cuts through credentials in my opinion. I take it as a given that not all doctors are logical, any more than all rocket scientists are logical. Some people are educated and logical and some people are just educated. What do I think about a doctor that I need? And, if there are NOT squamous intra-ep. lesions in people's bladders, please let me know. Thanks! XXXXXXX